How does Brightpick compare to cube storage?
Brightpick delivers higher labor savings and throughput while being easier to install, maintain and scale.
PERFORMANCE
Higher labor savings and throughput
Brightpick automates more fulfillment processes and delivers high throughput regardless of order profile.
| Cube Storage | ||
|---|---|---|
| Automated storage and retrieval | ||
| Automated putaway | ||
| Robotic picking | ||
| Order buffer | ||
| Automated order consolidation | ||
| Throughput | High | Medium (depends on order profile) |
| Max height | ~6 meters (20 feet) | ~6 meters (20 feet) |
PRACTICALITY
Easier to install and maintain
Our robots can be deployed in weeks and don’t require any fixed infrastructure or strict floor flatness. The Brightpick solution can be easily scaled by simply adding additional shelving and robots.
| Cube storage | ||
|---|---|---|
| Deployment Time | Weeks (no fixed infrastructure) | Months (requires extensive infrastructure) |
| Floor flatness requirements | Minimal | Strict |
| Flexibility | High (easy to move and reconfigure) | Very Low (limited to fixed grid) |
| Maintainability | Good (all parts easily accessible) | Poor (may require pausing system) |
| Single point of failure | No | Yes (failure on grid requires pausing system) |

Pricing
Flexible pricing models
Brightpick is available through Robots-as-a-Service (RaaS), starting from just $2,190 per robot / per month.
RaaS transforms warehouse automation from a large upfront capital investment into a manageable monthly operating cost, which reduces financial risk, simplifies budgeting, and delivers immediate ROI.
Alternatively, the Brightpick solution is also available through a standard CapEx purchase.
Learn moreWhat our customers say
Virtual demo
Watch our virtual demo of Brightpick Autopicker
Get Brightpick pricing & ROI
Whitepaper includes:
- Suitability (is Brightpick the right solution for you?)
- Pricing (transparent cost breakdown)
- ROI and savings (analysis of financial benefits)
- Solution design (detailed breakdown of the Brightpick system)
- Implementation timeline (step-by-step process to go live)
Frequently Asked Questions
-
What is the main difference between Brightpick and cube storage?
Cube storage systems are ASRS solutions in which robots move on top of a grid to retrieve bins and deliver them to picking stations. Brightpick instead uses mobile robots that navigate warehouse aisles and work with standard shelving and totes, making the system easier to install and scale.
-
Is Brightpick a good alternative to cube storage?
Brightpick could be a strong alternative to cube storage in cases such as: brownfield facilities where heavy retrofits are undesirable, projects requiring rapid installation, operations with a flat volume distribution across SKUs, warehouses with changing inventory profiles, businesses that value flexibility, operations that need easily scalable throughput, and companies targeting maximum labor reduction.
By comparison, cube storage is well suited for businesses prioritizing storage density with stable inventory and production profiles and limited need for future scaling.
-
How do I know if Brightpick or cube storage is better for my warehouse?
It depends on your priorities. Brightpick is well suited for fast-growing companies that value flexibility, quick scalability, and minimal labor. Cube storage systems are often better suited for companies that primarily prioritize storage density and have stable, mature operations.
-
How long does it take to install Brightpick compared to cube storage?
Brightpick can be installed in most warehouses within weeks, with a typical on-site installation time of 2-4 weeks from delivery to go-live. Cube storage installations generally take longer due to more extensive retrofits and construction. Actual timelines depend on site conditions and project scope.
-
Can Brightpick scale more easily than cube storage?
Brightpick does not rely on a fixed grid, so scaling can be as simple as adding robots and shelving. Scaling cube-storage systems typically requires grid extensions, additional ports, and supporting infrastructure such as conveyors.
-
Does Brightpick require major infrastructure changes like cube storage?
Unlike cube-based systems, Brightpick does not require fixed infrastructure such as grids or conveyors, strict floor flatness, or extensive fire safety modifications.
-
Which system is easier to reconfigure – Brightpick or cube storage?
Brightpick relies on mobile robots and standard shelving, which makes it easier to reconfigure or relocate. Grid-based ASRS can be expanded, yet are generally harder to change or adapt once installed.
-
Does Brightpick or cube storage provide higher labor savings?
Cube-storage systems typically rely on Goods-to-Person stations, so human operators are still needed to complete picks. Unlike cube systems, Brightpick robots can robotically pick items directly in-aisle and use Goods-to-Person stations only when required. This enables higher labor savings and throughput, although actual results depend on SKU and order mix.
-
Does Brightpick offer similar storage density to cube storage?
Both Brightpick and cube storage systems can reach a maximum height of about 20 feet (6 meters). Cube-based ASRS solutions achieve higher storage density by eliminating aisles and stacking totes, but this also requires digging for totes, which can reduce throughput in certain scenarios.
-
How do picking rates compare between Brightpick and cube storage systems?
Both systems support different configurations of Goods-to-Person stations, with throughput typically ranging from 100 to over 500 tote presentations per hour. In addition, Brightpick robots can robotically pick items directly in-aisle, providing additional throughput capacity.
-
Which is more reliable, Brightpick or cube storage?
Both Brightpick and cube storage systems are highly reliable. Brightpick is designed without a single point of failure, since its robots operate independently and operators can enter the system without interrupting operations.










